“Abraham was the father of the white race.”
I wouldn’t know it
for another 23 hours, but I had just made one of the most controversial
statements of my career.
A day later, I
would hear from one of my students, a girl who hardly ever said anything. At the beginning of the class hour, she
blurted out, “My mom says you are full of. . .”
She stopped appropriately for the classroom of those days, but everyone
knew how to fill in the blank.
I was
amused. I knew her mom rather well. I had
had her in class. Her grandmother
was an accomplished pianist who accompanied lots and lots of singing groups,
including some at school. I wasn’t
insulted. After all, my comment was
rather in jest, not a dogmatic statement.
Without
hesitancy, everyone in class chipped in.
“Yeah, my folks said they didn’t think you’re right.” Similar comments came from every corner of
the room. It ended with the preacher’s
kid.
“My dad says that
the Bible doesn’t actually say that.
Abraham was probably white.”
“ Then Terah
would be the father of the white race.
Abraham was black. Isaac was the
first white man,” I countered, still half jesting, as my original comments a
day earlier had been.
Objections
followed and I laughed. I admitted that
none of those things I had said were my idea, but ideas that had been
circulated for many years by some who knew a lot more about the Bible than I
did.
We moved on, but
I don’t remember what we were working on.
I just remember that the question
a day earlier came out of the blue and had nothing whatsoever to do with what
we doing in class.
The amazing thing
was that everyone was listening. In
day-to-day classroom work, the enemy is boredom, ennui, lack of participation,
lack of involvement. To think that they
were not only listening, but actually took it home.
“What did you
do at school today?”
“Oh, nothing.” No.
Instead, “The nutty teacher said
Adam and Eve were black, that Abraham was the father of the white race.” I had to laugh. Delightedly.
Ashton, we’ll
call her, caused the whole thing. She
was a blond, fair, student who, I came to find out wasn’t disinterested. Just quiet, maybe. Her question came out of nowhere. It was uttered seemingly without cause.
“Where did black
people come from?” she asked. The
question had nothing to do with anything we were working on.
Now in those days,
there was a guru named Madeline Hunter.
She was beloved by many a principal and superintendent. She provided a yardstick to actually gauge
teacher effectiveness. She made a
principal’s dreaded job of evaluating his charges a little easier.
She objectified an otherwise subjective
job. A principal could take a checklist
of characteristics with him to observe a teacher at work. He could fill it out and share it with the
teacher in the required evaluation conference.
She could even make suggestions of how to improve. Quite a difference from my evaluations in the
early days of my career.
A major problem
with disciples of Madeline Hunter was that the administrator used that
yardstick for purposes other than measuring, purposes that the schoolmaster of
old may have used a yardstick for. Like
whapping his charges over the head with it.
Some principals were unable to practice what they preached. They failed to dignify teacher’s actions when
they fell short of the glory of Madeline.
Madeline Hunter
made a career of studying successful teachers.
She sought out those teachers who were successful, who were acclaimed by
students, principals, and parents, whose students did well on SAT and ACT
tests. She visited their classrooms, sat
in with their individual student conferences, observed their dealing with
parents.
Then she drew up
some characteristics that all these successful teachers demonstrated. And less successful teachers failed to demonstrate.
It came to pass
that Madeline Hunter left her home in fertile California to sojourn in the heart
of the Great American Desert for a night and a day, in Colby, Kansas. And many of the pedagogues of Northwest
Kansas gathered on an artificial hillside known as the basketball court of the
Colby Community Building to listen to the great teacher of teachers.
For six hours,
three hours before lunch and three hours after lunch (I don’t remember what was
for lunch, but it wasn’t fish and loaves) she dwelt on the subject of “Dignifying
a Wrong Answer.”
One of the things
good teachers do is establish a personal relationship with their charges. Jesus and Socrates come to mind.
Maintaining a
good relationship prohibits embarrassing a student, especially in front of her
peers. So, when a wrong answer appears,
you must handle it, without ignoring it, with a response that will allow the
incorrect answerer to retain his dignity.
It’s a form of “Jeopardy.” When the wrong answer appears, you say
something like, “Oh, you must be thinking of . . . .” Then you supply a question for which the
wrong answer is the RIGHT answer!
In the last section of her six hour
presentation, Madeline answered written questions submitted by teachers, many
who had felt the sting of the Madeline Hunter yardstick on their hides. One question that appeared more than once
dealt with the subject of “time-on-task.”
Madeline observed that good teachers spent a lot of their allotted class
time engaged with students during the class “period.”
So some administrative
disciples would actually set a stopwatch to see how long a teacher spent
working with students during the class hour.
It meant a teacher needed to be still trying to engage students on a
subject at the end of a long hour. No
time to just relax and visit with students.
Well, Madeline
set them straight. When you’re done, you’re
done, she said, in answer to a question she read from a small slip of paper. No use whipping a dead horse. She also said that some days, when the
students can’t settle down and get to work, you might just as well pack it in
and try again tomorrow. I don’t think
the ones who needed to listen to that actually listened to that.
And now I must say that I was fortunate
never to have to work under that kind of pressure or stress. My principals were all good, as far as I was
concerned. But, we did have some in our
system. . . .
Anyway, we had
had six hours of strategies to handle wrong answers from the great lady. So when Ashton supplied not an incorrect
answer, but a totally non sequitur question, my training kicked in. Not for nothing did I spend six hours on the manufactured
hillside attending the great pedagogical guru.
“Where did black people come from?’
“Adam and Eve
were black. Abraham was the father of
the white race.”
The question wasn’t
where did black people come from. The
question was, where did the mutation known as Isaac come from!
It wasn’t the
first time I made controversial statements, even ridiculous ones, just to see
if anyone was listening. It wouldn’t be
the last time either.
It was the only
time I got such a universal and unanimous reaction.
No comments:
Post a Comment